<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://xcskiwinn.org/community/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Why hasn't anybody focused on user rights in all the Windows security hole debate?</title><link>http://xcskiwinn.org/community/blogs/panmanphil/archive/2003/09/16/150.aspx</link><description>With all the visibility on the security holes in Microsoft's products, one underlying problem seems to always get missed in the discussions. I still believe that it's possible to have a fully secure system running all Microsoft products. That's a bold</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator></channel></rss>